Due to problems stemming from bad loans made by the Barrow County branches of Community Bank & Trust, the federal FDIC released a “cease and desist order” against the firm Friday.
The order, dated May 11, 2009, slams the bank’s board of directors and management, saying “the Bank had engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practices and had committed violations of law and/or regulations.”
According to those close to the situation, the problems are a result of lax loan practices in Barrow County where the bank has offices in Winder, Bethlehem and Auburn.
The 29-page order lists a long series of activities the bank will now have to do, including raising additional capital, reclassifying bad loans, and strengthening board and management practices.
The bank, which has assets of $1 billion-plus, is based in Habersham County and has branches throughout Northeast Georgia, as well as a smaller number in West Georgia and East Alabama.
news. He would be embarrassed by this development.
It's time we all stopped being so damn greedy and started loving our neighbors.
Keeping up with the Joneses is for losers.
Freedom bank was Loaning money to people that
should not have been buying anything.
They had bad management
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2009/06/29/afx6599559.html
Habersham Bank is under a Cease and Desist also. Unfortunately, it is a sign of the current economic conditions. Many banks are right now. Things will improve. No need to single out CB&T or Habersham Bank.
Notice I'm not asking "when", I'm asking "how".
They did not receive any tarp funds and chose to make this all on their own
I know they will be fine
Customer
You Can Help!!!!
Go buy a foreclosed home and take advantage of the $8000 tax credits for 1st time home buyers. Buy a lot or property. Build a house on it; hold it for your kids or as an investment. You’ll make money on it in the long term. Its time to buy!!!
Andy,
Are YOU buying foreclosed homes? Are you buying vacant lots or property? Are you building houses at the moment? Or are you just promoting these as a means to earn a commission on the sale of real estate?
I've heard cries of "foul" over the new appraisal rules the restrict contact between principals and appraisers. But, I always thought it was wrong for the appraiser to know the prospective sales price for the property they were appraising.
I am glad to see cb t working through without tarp
From the news media tarp may have strings attached to them.
Asset problems is why the larger banks received tarp.
I cannot speak to management issure in any of the banks,large or small.
Smaller banks usually have a small number of investors
who shoulder the responsibility for defaults.
In addition to this you might notice that nearly every bank
which recieved tarp money, was approached by FDIC, or the fed.
to purchase other banks as they default.
Bank of America bought Merril lynch
Wellsfargo bought Wachovia
Suntrust bought GB+T and several other small banks.
Also, SunTrust bought GB&T way before they received any TARP money.
Banks had to apply to receive TARP - the application process was fairly rigorous. There were a number of financial requirements that had to be met prior to receiving the money. Unfortunately, some banks didn't meet the requirements and were already too far gone for TARP to save them.
What it boils down to is that a large number of banks bet heavily on the real estate market and it tanked. Even the banks that stayed away from the real estate loans are suffering - individuals that they made loans to (who were probably qualified to receive the loan at the time) suffered from the real estate crisis which inhibited their ability to repay the other loans.
The FDIC and Georgia Department of Banking and Finance should have done a better job monitoring the banks' activities. That is why they were created. A bank's loan portfolio is like a person's retirement portfolio - you want to reduce risk by not putting all your eggs in one basket. Unfortunately, a lot of banks seemed to disregard that idea and went all in on a bad bet.
The majority of banks are doing just fine, and sadly that is something that the press has chosen to ignore. By publishing stories like this one, they're only creating more of a problem as customers begin to doubt the security of the bank at hand. If customers were smart enough to stay within FDIC insurance limits, they'll be taken care of.
I was extremely surprised to see this headline and am very disappointed in the paper.