Dear Editor:

Polls show that 76% of Americans like the coronavirus relief bill, including 60% of Republicans.  

It includes $1,400 stimulus checks, improved unemployment benefits, $350 billion in aid to state and local governments, tax credits for children, money to schools, $8.5 billion to distribute vaccines and relief for small businesses.

The bill is popular among Republican mayors and governors, whose governments cannot borrow to make up for tax revenue lost because of the pandemic and the billions in deficits they’re facing. As one conservative mayor said, relief isn’t a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s a public health, economic and public safety issue.

As Congressman Hice complained before casting his NO vote to provide relief for us, there is unspent money from previous coronavirus relief bills. But here’s the thing: that unspent money has been allocated to be distributed among programs designed to spend it over a period of time.  Such as, the Paycheck Protection Program, which is held in reserve for employers to apply for funds from it; enhanced medical matching funds to be distributed as the pandemic requires; and tax breaks to be spent as people file their tax returns.

This is a bill that should’ve gotten our Congressman’s and some other Republicans’ votes. But it didn’t. They claim it’s partisan. But the problem isn’t the bill. The problem is Republican lawmakers, who are determined to oppose anything Democrats propose.

In spite of the opposition, Democrats are going ti make sure the majority gets what they need — relief.

Randy Poole


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.